A Century of Criminal Justice, Human Rights and Humanity across Borders. (Centenary Ceremony of the International Association of Penal Law (AIDP/IAPL)) RIDP Libri 07
A Century of Criminal Justice, Human Rights and Humanity across Borders. (Centenary Ceremony of the International Association of Penal Law (AIDP/IAPL)) RIDP Libri 07
Wetboek Strafrecht – Strafwetboek, Wetboek van Strafvordering, Bijzondere wetten 44ste bijgewerkte druk (Volledig bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2023)
Een uitgebreid herwerkt alfabetisch trefwoordenregister maakt het geheel bovendien erg gebruiksvriendelijk. Alle teksten zijn bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2023.
Gert Vermeulen is gewoon hoogleraar (internationaal en Europees) strafrecht aan de Universiteit Gent en directeur van het Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP) en van het Knowledge and Research Platform Privacy, Information Exchange, Law Enforcement and Surveillance(PIXLES). Hij voert internationaal relevant wetenschappelijk onderzoek op het brede terrein van het strafrechtelijk beleid.
Wetboek Strafrecht – Strafwetboek, Wetboek van Strafvordering, Bijzondere wetten 44ste bijgewerkte druk (Volledig bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2023)
Een uitgebreid herwerkt alfabetisch trefwoordenregister maakt het geheel bovendien erg gebruiksvriendelijk. Alle teksten zijn bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2023.
Gert Vermeulen is gewoon hoogleraar (internationaal en Europees) strafrecht aan de Universiteit Gent en directeur van het Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP) en van het Knowledge and Research Platform Privacy, Information Exchange, Law Enforcement and Surveillance(PIXLES). Hij voert internationaal relevant wetenschappelijk onderzoek op het brede terrein van het strafrechtelijk beleid.
Wetboek Strafrecht – 43ste, herziene uitgave / bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2022
Een uitgebreid herwerkt alfabetisch trefwoordenregister maakt het geheel bovendien erg gebruiksvriendelijk.
Alle teksten zijn bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2022.
Wetboek Strafrecht – 43ste, herziene uitgave / bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2022
Een uitgebreid herwerkt alfabetisch trefwoordenregister maakt het geheel bovendien erg gebruiksvriendelijk.
Alle teksten zijn bijgewerkt tot 1 augustus 2022.
RIDP 2021.2 – EU criminal policy: advances and challenges
No time for stand-still, though. Since 2020, the European Commission has launched a tsunami of new legislative proposals, including in the sphere of EU criminal law, strongly framed in its new EU Security Union Strategy.
This special issue on ‘EU criminal policy. Advances and challenges’ discusses and assesses some of the newest developments, both in an overarching fashion and in focused papers, relating to key 2022 novelties for Europol (ie the competence to conduct AI-based pre-analysis in (big) data sets, and extended cooperation with private parties), the sensitive debate since 2020 on criminalising (LGBTIQ) hate speech and hate crime at EU level, the 2022 Cybersecurity Directive, the potential of the 2020 Conditionality Regulation to address rule of law issues undermining the trustworthiness of Member States when issuing European Arrest Warrants, and concerns about free speech limitation by the 2021 Terrorist Content Online Regulation.
RIDP 2021.2 – EU criminal policy: advances and challenges
No time for stand-still, though. Since 2020, the European Commission has launched a tsunami of new legislative proposals, including in the sphere of EU criminal law, strongly framed in its new EU Security Union Strategy.
This special issue on ‘EU criminal policy. Advances and challenges’ discusses and assesses some of the newest developments, both in an overarching fashion and in focused papers, relating to key 2022 novelties for Europol (ie the competence to conduct AI-based pre-analysis in (big) data sets, and extended cooperation with private parties), the sensitive debate since 2020 on criminalising (LGBTIQ) hate speech and hate crime at EU level, the 2022 Cybersecurity Directive, the potential of the 2020 Conditionality Regulation to address rule of law issues undermining the trustworthiness of Member States when issuing European Arrest Warrants, and concerns about free speech limitation by the 2021 Terrorist Content Online Regulation.
RIDP 2021.1 Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
RIDP 2021.1 Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / IP-only
On the first issue:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / IP-only
On the first issue:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / 2 Issues + Password
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / 2 Issues + Password
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / 2 Issues + IP
On the first issue:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
RIDP2021 Vol.92 / Subscription – Revue Internationale de Droit Penal / 2 Issues + IP
On the first issue:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting our everyday lives in a myriad of ways. The use of algorithms, AI agents and big data techniques also creates unprecedented opportunities for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences and the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Equally, however, the rapid increase of AI and big data in criminal justice raises a plethora of criminological, ethical, legal and technological questions and concerns, eg about enhanced surveillance and control in a pre-crime society and the risk of bias or even manipulation in (automated) decision-making. In view of the stakes involved, the need for regulation of AI and its alignment with human rights, democracy and the rule of law standards has been amply recognised, both globally and regionally. The lawfulness, social acceptance and overall legitimacy of AI, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice will depend on a range of factors, including (algorithmic) transparency, trustworthiness, non-discrimination, accountability, responsibility, effective over-sight, data protection, due process, fair trial, access to justice, effective redress and remedy. Addressing these issues and raising awareness on AI systems’ capabilities and limitations within criminal justice is needed to be better prepared for the future that is now upon us.
This special issue on ‘Artificial intelligence, big data and automated decision-making in criminal justice’ comprises topical and innovative papers on the above issues, centred around AI and big data in predictive detection and policing, liability issues and jurisdictional challenges prompted by crimes involving AI, and AI-assisted and automated actuarial justice or adjudication of criminal cases.
On the second Issue:
To be published
Strategic market position of the European Crime Prevention Network
Whilst the EUCPN proves a well-equipped, versatile and multipurpose network in the EU crime prevention area, consolidation and further boosting are due. Key suggestions are to enhance outputsand visibility, to intensify existing partnerships, to broaden target and beneficiary audiences, including at local levels, to implement practice-oriented, multi-language and multimedia approaches, andto focus on the implementation, monitoring, coordination and evaluation of crime prevention policies or strategies, including through cooperation with academia.
Strategic market position of the European Crime Prevention Network
Whilst the EUCPN proves a well-equipped, versatile and multipurpose network in the EU crime prevention area, consolidation and further boosting are due. Key suggestions are to enhance outputsand visibility, to intensify existing partnerships, to broaden target and beneficiary audiences, including at local levels, to implement practice-oriented, multi-language and multimedia approaches, andto focus on the implementation, monitoring, coordination and evaluation of crime prevention policies or strategies, including through cooperation with academia.
Data Protection and Privacy Under Pressure. Transatlantic tensions,EU Surveillance and big data
Since the Snowden revelations, the adoption in May 2016 of the GeneralData Protection Regulation and several ground-breaking judgments ofthe Court of Justice of the European Union, data protection andprivacy are high on the agenda of policymakers, industries and thelegal research community.
Against this backdrop, Data Protection and Privacy under Pressuresheds light on key developments where individuals’ rights to dataprotection and privacy are at stake. The book discusses the persistenttransatlantic tensions around various EU-US data transfer mechanismsand EU jurisdiction claims over non-EU-based companies, both sparkedby milestone court cases. Additionally, it scrutinises the expandingcontrol or surveillance mechanisms and interconnection of databases inthe areas of migration control, internal security and law enforcement,and oversight thereon. Finally, it explores current and future legalchallenges related to big data and automated decision-making in thecontexts of policing, pharmaceutics and advertising.
Data Protection and Privacy Under Pressure. Transatlantic tensions,EU Surveillance and big data
Since the Snowden revelations, the adoption in May 2016 of the GeneralData Protection Regulation and several ground-breaking judgments ofthe Court of Justice of the European Union, data protection andprivacy are high on the agenda of policymakers, industries and thelegal research community.
Against this backdrop, Data Protection and Privacy under Pressuresheds light on key developments where individuals’ rights to dataprotection and privacy are at stake. The book discusses the persistenttransatlantic tensions around various EU-US data transfer mechanismsand EU jurisdiction claims over non-EU-based companies, both sparkedby milestone court cases. Additionally, it scrutinises the expandingcontrol or surveillance mechanisms and interconnection of databases inthe areas of migration control, internal security and law enforcement,and oversight thereon. Finally, it explores current and future legalchallenges related to big data and automated decision-making in thecontexts of policing, pharmaceutics and advertising.
