Cross-border execution of judgements involving deprivation of liberty in the EU (IRCP – series, 40)
€ 67,00
The introduction in 2008 of the Framework Decision on the application of the principle
of mutual recognition to judgements in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences
or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in
the European Union sparked discussions as to whether the practical operation of the
instrument would be compatible with its very objective, being the enhancement of
detained persons’ social rehabilitation prospects.
Transferring detained peo…
Op voorraad
The introduction in 2008 of the Framework Decision on the application of the principle
of mutual recognition to judgements in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences
or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in
the European Union sparked discussions as to whether the practical operation of the
instrument would be compatible with its very objective, being the enhancement of
detained persons’ social rehabilitation prospects.
Transferring detained people back to their respective Member State of residence and/or
nationality within the mutual recognition framework is somewhat precarious in light of
the often substantial variety of Member States’ legal and prison systems. In this context,
and following a call for tender by the European Commission, the authors conducted the
biggest study to date on Member States’ material detention conditions, early/conditional
release provisions and sentence execution modalities. In addition to exploring the
diversity of legal frameworks, the study also assessed practitioners’ views on cross-border
execution of custodial sentences in the EU.
This book contains both the EU level legal and practitioners’ analyses as well as the high
level final report to the study, confirming preliminary concerns that flanking measures
are urgently needed for a proper operation of the Framework Decision.
This is essential reading for EU policy makers, judicial and law enforcement authorities
and for defence lawyers throughout the Union. Undoubtedly, this book will be an asset
to everyone who is involved in or taking an interest in detention issues and cross-border
execution of judgements involving deprivation of liberty in the EU.
Boek informatie
Gerelateerde producten
Panopticon – Tijdschrift voor strafrecht, criminologie en forensisch welzijnswerk – 2005, nr. 5
Panopticon – Tijdschrift voor strafrecht, criminologie en forensisch welzijnswerk – 2005, nr. 5
Pricing Algorithms in EU competition law.
This book aims to do just that, using the results of economic research and computer science as the starting point for a legal analysis of these digital cartels. It analyses several forms of algorithmic collusion in decreasing order of human involvement. Indeed, the role of algorithms can range from supporting a cartel to being its sole perpetrator, and each scenario tests current competition law in a different way. This is followed by an overarching perspective on public and private enforcement, as well as a brief discussion of two related issues at the intersection of data protection and competition law: personalised pricing and algorithmic consumers.
Pricing Algorithms in EU competition law.
This book aims to do just that, using the results of economic research and computer science as the starting point for a legal analysis of these digital cartels. It analyses several forms of algorithmic collusion in decreasing order of human involvement. Indeed, the role of algorithms can range from supporting a cartel to being its sole perpetrator, and each scenario tests current competition law in a different way. This is followed by an overarching perspective on public and private enforcement, as well as a brief discussion of two related issues at the intersection of data protection and competition law: personalised pricing and algorithmic consumers.